Anthony H. Gatensby

Partner
P: 416-593-3987
F: 416-594-3591
Email    PDF    VCard
  • Called to the Bar of Ontario, 2015
Anthony Gatensby Photo ©2021 Blaney McMurtry LLP
 Overview

Anthony’s practice is devoted to all aspects of insurance coverage. Anthony’s extensive experience has made him a resource for both domestic and international clients at the primary, excess, and reinsurance levels. 

Anthony frequently provides practical legal advice and representation to both insurers and policyholders on all manner of first-party and third-party insurance coverage matters. He regularly provides advice on potential and existing claims, both before and during litigation. He is consulted on the re-writing of existing policies and the implementation of new wordings and policy forms. He appears routinely in applications and before appellate courts on novel issues of law. Regardless of the task, Anthony’s solutions are pragmatic, cost-effective, and tailored to meet his client’s needs.

Anthony maintains a deep and extensive knowledge of insurance law. By keeping himself on the forefront of the most challenging issues facing both the insurance industry and its consumers, he is continually consulting on particularly complex matters, including issues related to COVID-19.
 

 Practice Areas  Called to the Bar
  • Called to the Bar of Ontario, 2015
 Assistant  Experience
  • Vale Canada Limited v. RSA, 2022 ONCA 862 -

    View Decision here.

  • Workman Optometry Professional Corp. et. ats. Certas Home and Auto, 2022 ONSC 597 -

    View Decision here.

  • Loblaw Companies Limited v. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada, 2022 ONSC 449 -

    View Decision here.

  • Intact Insurance et al. ats. Burlock, Katherine and Adam (re: Lazi Ventures), CV-21-00000149-00A1 (unreported - Brantford) -

    View Decision here.

  • Zurich Insurance Company Limited (UK Branch) et al. ats. Vale Canada et al., 2022 ONSC 12 -

    View Decision here.

  • Vale Canada Limited v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada, 2021 ONSC 6377 -

    View Decision here.

  • Panasonic Eco Solutions Canada Inc. v. XL Specialty Insurance Company, 2020 ONSC 1502 and 2021 ONCA 612 -

    View Decision here.

  • Intact Insurance Company v. Jaynee Drake-Ghafoori, CV-19-00623625 -

    View Decision here.

  • Temple Insurance Company v. Novex Insurance Company, 2020 ONSC 1677 -

    View Decision here.

  • Krosel et al. v. Intact Insurance Co., CV-18-2347 -

    (unreported – Brampton) - View Decision here.

  • London Life Insurance Company et al. v. Lloyd's Underwriters, CV-19-618860 -

    View Decision here.

  • Sovereign General Insurance Co. and Abyan, Re, 2018 CarswellOnt 17515 (FSCO (Appeal)) -

    View Decision here.

  • 17-005685 v. Economical Mutual Insurance Company, 2018 CarswellOnt 19833 (LAT) -

    View Decision here.

  • Decision No. 2053/16, ONWSIAT 715 -

    View Decision here.

  • Economical Insurance and Zurich Insurance Co., Re, 2017 CarswellOnt 20317 (Arb) -

    View Decision here.

  • Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. and Continental Casualty Co., Re, 2017 CarswellOnt 7581 (Arb) -

    View Decision here.

  • Intact Insurance Co. v. Old Republic Insurance Co., 2016 CarswellOnt 23977 (Arb) and 2016 ONSC 3110 -

    View Decision here.

  • TD Meloche Monnex v. 2234101 Ontario Inc, 2015 ONSC 8135 -

    View Decision here.

 Recognition

Recognition

  • Recognized by Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch in Canada 2023 in the area of Insurance Law
 Speaking  Publications
 In the Media  News
 Memberships

Memberships

  • Member at Large, Ontario Bar Association Insurance Law Section Executive

DISCLAIMER

Thank you for your interest in contacting us by email.

Please be aware that contacting us via e-mail does not mean that the firm is acting for the sender of the e-mail. People do not become clients unless and until the firm agrees to act and that representation will be confirmed in a retainer agreement or retainer letter, in accordance with our usual policies. Unless you are an existing client, no information provided in an e-mail will be considered confidential. We ask that you do not send us specific questions on any matter until you receive confirmation that we are able to represent you.